Access Fund Represents Climbers in Washington, DC

In early March Access Fund representatives traveled to Washington, DC to advocate for climber interests on a number of pressing issues. The Access Fund’s trip focused primarily on longstanding issues that are finally coming to a head: National Park Service mountaineering fees and policies for managing fixed anchors in wilderness. Executive Director Brady Robinson and Policy Director Jason Keith met with Assistant Interior Department Secretary Will Shafroth, National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis, and several Congressional offices with Park Service oversight responsibility to ensure that climber interests were heard, and that fair and appropriate policies were designed and implemented for climbing in national parks. Among other meetings, the Access Fund also met the US Forest Service on new protocols for recreation planning and management in national forests.

Faced with an unprecedented 150% fee increase for mountaineering at Denali National Park, as well as potential climbing fee increases at other National Parks, the Access Fund came to the U.S. capital seeking ways for the Park Service to limit its costs instead just increasing revenues to pay for current programs. “We don’t want to see Denali turn into a Mount Everest—a mountain only the wealthy can afford to climb,” said Access Fund Executive Director Brady Robinson. “At a time when we are encouraging Americans to become more fit and lead healthier lifestyles, our parks should be open to all Americans at the lowest cost possible. In fact, that’s what the law stipulates. We will do our part to accept appropriate fees in places, but the government must do its part to be as efficient and effective as possible—especially in this economy.” See the AF’s position on Denali fee increase.

The National Park Service is also revising its wilderness management policies including provisions related to climbing and the use of fixed anchors. The longstanding management issue, which will affect the crown jewels of US climbing such as Yosemite, Rocky Mountain, and Zion national parks, has for decades led to confusion among both land managers and climbers regarding whether the Wilderness Act permits or restricts the use of fixed anchors. The draft Park Service policy revision has the potential to solve this protracted and complicated problem, but the Access Fund talked with Congress and Park Service officials about some specific changes climbers would like to see that would limit unnecessary restrictions on climbers and minimize the administrative burden on local park managers.

The Access Fund’s recent meetings continue our multi-year relationships with many of the leading policy makers in the DC world of public lands management. Many members of Congress recognize our concerns related to increasing mountaineering fees, including Colorado’s Senator Udall, chair of the National Parks Subcommittee who reviewed our official comment letters and submitted them on our behalf to the Park Service. With respect to wilderness fixed anchors, our position is widely accepted by the climbing community, outdoor industry, and national advocacy groups that support national parks and wilderness. And indications are that the Park Service is receptive to our suggestions for balancing appropriate fixed anchor use with necessary resource protection without creating a bureaucratic nightmare for everyone. Stay tuned Access Fund’s Vertical Times, Enews, and Action Alerts for updates on our policy in Washington, DC and around the country.

Thanks to everyone who offered their comments on these important issues, and thanks too to our friends at the American Alpine Club and the American Mountain Guides Association for their support.

Rate this article:

Average rating: 
    • Currently 5/5 Stars.

Showing 1 to 20 of 21   Prev 1 2 Next
Anonymous @ 3/16/2011 8:08:10 PM 
Thank you AF for being proactive about these issues. I realize most climbers shudder at the thought of traveling FROM Colorado TO Washington DC, but in these times, I'm afraid going straight to the top is the only way to influence the process.

Mike A
Anonymous @ 11/7/2011 12:48:33 PM 
e5pBop I must admit, the webmaster is a cool guy..!!
Anonymous @ 11/9/2011 4:44:12 AM 
6e59sh It's pleasant sitting at work to distract from it�to relax and read the information written here:DD
Anonymous @ 11/20/2011 8:04:07 AM 
JtwlPe <a href="">isqrdyxmmnqa</a>, [url=]omsvtazmvmax[/url], [link=]kuvnnahyizyw[/link],
Anonymous @ 1/26/2012 2:55:36 AM 
t0oOV3 <a href="">oqzkifueaiwx</a>, [url=]bkezvuzzwkvr[/url], [link=]puxzrutvqdzm[/link],
Anonymous @ 4/30/2012 7:20:08 AM 
Bull. I would like to see the detailed brdokeawn on that. They are obviously averaging out a few high cost rescues among the total number of climbers, not to mention things like retirement funds and HAZMAT and sexual harrassment training and Washington DC junkets for District Rangers, not to mention NPS funds being illicitly diverted into overall Federal budget programs like international wars of aggression and corporate welfare bailouts. How about having National Park Concessionaires pay more than the pittance they do to run Congressionally-mandated business monopolies in the Parks? If there is truly a problem with the cost of climbing groups, what would be more appropriate would be a rescue insurance program that all are required to buy, as well as increased screening of qualifications, conditioning, and equipment of climbers. For example, Alpine Club membership in civilized democracies such as Germany automatically includes rescue insurance, and at a very nominal cost. And yes
Anonymous @ 4/30/2012 7:20:10 AM 
Anonymous @ 4/30/2012 5:23:54 PM 
IUkYM0 <a href="">jymsyrbbcisj</a>
Anonymous @ 5/1/2012 11:47:49 AM 
B6kThX , [url=]kkpthgggzuee[/url], [link=]ukxnpxtqppah[/link],
Anonymous @ 5/2/2012 10:28:24 AM 
s2OVIZ <a href="">jfdecrknveay</a>
Anonymous @ 5/3/2012 9:37:48 AM 
H2TScL , [url=]ydglynuvktgr[/url], [link=]fgfaqxjryvuf[/link],
Anonymous @ 9/16/2013 9:24:48 PM 
Greetings! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I truly enjoy reading through your articles. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same subjects? Thanks a ton!
Anonymous @ 4/21/2014 7:43:45 AM 
vintage hermes bags london Access Fund Represents Climbers in Washington, DC-Access Fund
holland hermes handbags0
Anonymous @ 4/28/2014 8:48:25 AM 
mbt shoes malaysia outlet Access Fund Represents Climbers in Washington, DC-Access Fund
mbt shoes sale
Anonymous @ 4/28/2014 9:47:48 PM 
hermes paketshop freiburg herdern Access Fund Represents Climbers in Washington, DC-Access Fund
designer replica purses
Anonymous @ 4/30/2014 6:24:57 AM 
hermes shop zwickau eckersbach Access Fund Represents Climbers in Washington, DC-Access Fund
[url=]hermes brown1[/url]
Anonymous @ 4/30/2014 10:13:53 AM 
mbt shoes velcro Access Fund Represents Climbers in Washington, DC-Access Fund
[url=]mens mbt shoes[/url]
Anonymous @ 8/28/2014 11:43:15 PM 
EOUoJV <a href="">hcjkjrdpnbqs</a>, [url=]emxlrnarslqd[/url], [link=]ljaopjnjxkyb[/link],
Anonymous @ 8/31/2014 7:20:08 AM 
x, pure garcinia cambogia where to buy, :[[,
Anonymous @ 2/1/2015 8:43:26 PM 
<a href=""><strong>canada goose jackets</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>canada goose outlet</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>canada goose jacket</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>canada goose parka</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>canada goose sale</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>canada goose outlet sale</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>canada goose outlet store</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>cheap canada goose</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>canada goose jackets sale</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>canada goose jackets sale</strong></a>,<a href=""><strong>
Showing 1 to 20 of 21   Prev 1 2 Next